MIT Statement

MIT Statement on Freedom of Expression and Academic Freedom



The following statement, drafted by the MIT Ad Hoc Working Group on Free Expression and

amended by the MIT Faculty through extensive discussion and debate, was adopted by the

Faculty on December 21, 2022. This statement was then endorsed as MIT policy by the President of MIT on February 27, 2023.


The influential 1949 Lewis Report observed that MIT’s mission was “to encourage initiative,

to promote the spirit of free and objective inquiry, to recognize and provide opportunities for

unusual interests and aptitudes,” and to develop “individuals who will contribute creatively

to our society.” With a tradition of celebrating provocative thinking, controversial views, and

nonconformity, MIT unequivocally endorses the principles of freedom of expression and

academic freedom.


Free expression is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition of a diverse and inclusive

community. We cannot have a truly free community of expression if some perspectives can

be heard and others cannot. Learning from a diversity of viewpoints, and from the

deliberation, debate, and dissent that accompany them, is an essential ingredient of academic

excellence.


Free expression promotes creativity by affirming the ability to exchange ideas without

constraints. It not only facilitates individual autonomy and self-fulfillment, it provides for

participation in collective decision-making and is essential to the search for truth and justice.

Free expression is enhanced by the doctrine of academic freedom, which protects both

intramural and extramural expression without institutional censorship or discipline.

Academic freedom promotes scholarly rigor and the testing of ideas by protecting research,

publication, and teaching from interference.


MIT does not protect direct threats, harassment, plagiarism, or other speech that falls outside

the boundaries of the First Amendment. Moreover, the time, place, and manner of protected

expression, including organized protests, may be restrained so as not to disrupt the essential

activities of the Institute.


At the intersection of the ideal of free expression and MIT community values lies the

expectation of a collegial and respectful learning and working environment. We cannot

prohibit speech that some experience as offensive or injurious. At the same time, MIT deeply

values civility, mutual respect, and uninhibited, wide-open debate. In fostering such debate,

we have a responsibility to express ourselves in ways that consider the prospect of offense

and injury and the risk of discouraging others from expressing their own views. This

responsibility complements, and does not conflict with, the right to free expression. Even

robust disagreements shall not be liable to official censure or disciplinary action. This applies

broadly. For example, when MIT leaders speak on matters of public interest, whether in their

own voice or in the name of MIT, this should always be understood as being open to debate

by the broader MIT community.


A commitment to free expression includes hearing and hosting speakers, including those

whose views or opinions may not be shared by many members of the MIT community and

may be harmful to some. This commitment includes the freedom to criticize and peacefully

protest speakers to whom one may object, but it does not extend to suppressing or restricting

such speakers from expressing their views. Debate and deliberation of controversial ideas are

hallmarks of the Institute’s educational and research missions and are essential to the pursuit

of truth, knowledge, equity, and justice.


MIT has played a leading role in the continuing transformation of communication

technology, and recent digital and networked modes of speech make our campus more

accessible to all. At the same time, those technologies make our campus more disembodied

and more vulnerable to the pull of ideological extremes. Although new modes of speech

change the character of expression, such technologies need not and should not lessen our

commitment to the values underlying free speech, even as we adapt creatively to meet the

needs of our physical and virtual landscapes.